A A A In fine of KRW 1 million, Defendant B’s imprisonment for August, Defendant C is punished by a fine of KRW 2 million, and Defendant D.

1. On November 25, 201, Defendant A found the “I entertainment tavern” of D’s operation in the Daegu Suwon-gu, as a guest, and provided 300,000 won to B, who are female employees of the said entertainment tavern and drink in the said entertainment tavern, and provided 30,000 won as a purchase price for sexual intercourse in the said entertainment tavern. The Defendant provided her sexual intercourse in the said G and Daegu Suwon-gu K.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B was employed as female employees by serving as “M entertainment tavern” located in Daegu Suwon-gu H from around 2009 to May 2010, and as “I entertainment tavern” located in Daegu Suwon-gu H from May 2010 to April 2012.

On November 25, 201, the Defendant, from around June 23, 2010 to April 2012, 201, engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic with approximately 300,000 won by receiving 30,000 won from A who entered the “I entertainment tavern” located in the Daegu Suwon-gu, as a customer, and had the said J, a female employee, engage in the said A and commercial sex acts at the Lel located in the Daegu Sung-gu K, Daegu-gu, by allowing the saidJ to engage in the said A and commercial sex acts.

3. From around 2008 to January 201, 2010, Defendant C operated “M entertainment tavern” in Daegu Suwon-gu H, and, in relation to his duties, Defendant C took 300,000 won as the purchase price of sexual intercourse from N who visited the customer of “M entertainment tavern” at around wintering in 2009 and received 300,000 won as the purchase price of sexual intercourse from N who visited the customer of “M entertainment tavern”. Defendant C had his female employee engage in sexual intercourse at the Oel located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu H. In doing so.

4. Defendant D

A. The Defendant stated the indictment changed around October 2009 as a lowerman in 2009. However, according to the indictment prior to the change and the evidence related thereto, the Defendant appears to be a clerical error in around October 2009. As such, the Defendant appears to be above.

From January 201 to January 201, 201.