2. The judgment of the court below and the court of original instance showed the attitude that the defendant committed the crime of this case in the investigative agency, the court below and the court of original instance, and the defendant committed the crime of this case through confinement life for about two months. The crime of this case was committed upon the request of G, which is a substantial amnesty, and the victim did not seem to have suffered personal benefits through the crime of this case, and the victim is expected to receive a certain amount of damage from the dong B, the crime of this case was committed in favor of the defendant. However, although the contents of the crime of this case are poor as if the doping machines already transferred were not legally defective, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the money, even though the acquired money was a large amount, the damage was not completely restored. The sentencing of the court below seems to have taken into account all the favorable circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances different from the above favorable circumstances, and considering the age, character, character, environment, occupation, power, process of the crime of this case, method and circumstance before and after the crime of this case, it is unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.