난민불인정결정취소
1. The part of the conjunctive claim in the instant lawsuit is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.
3...
1. The background of the decision on the refusal of refugee status in this case
A. On May 4, 2017, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “Pakic Republic”), entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit sojourn status, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 2, 2017.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant application for refugee status”). (b)
On June 22, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee non-recognition on the ground that “The 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as the “Refugee Convention”) Article 1 of the 1951 Convention, and Article 1 of the 1967 Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as the “Refugee Protocol”) of the 1967 Act cannot be recognized as “the well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee.
(hereinafter “instant decision on the refusal of refugee status”). 【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The plaintiff's assertion and relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In the first place, the Plaintiff was born in the punjb area of Pakistan, and the Plaintiff was an organization that claims the separation of the Carasscir region from the Kasscir region in around 2014 (hereinafter “B”).
As a member of the Committee, I have been in charge of the role of educating party members with a position to be a supplementary position.
① However, in around 2014, C, an investigator belonging to the police station in Pakistan, demanded the Plaintiff to suspend B’s activities by telephone. ② The police police and soldiers in Pakistan were searched the Plaintiff’s house between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff. ③ After one month thereafter, the investigator D, who belongs to the police station in Pakistan, demanded the Plaintiff to suspend B activities by telephone. ④ On January 24, 2017, the Plaintiff was opened in the B military unit.