However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on November 27, 1992.

On April 2012, the Defendant had scam B and once studio in Gju located in F in Scambling, 2012.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and had sexual intercourse with A once at the same time and place as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of complaint, marriage relation certificate, and claim for divorce;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: the latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime of this case) of the suspended execution.