beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.18 2017누74612

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] Article 3 of the first instance judgment, " March 1, 2012" in the 14th page 3 of the first instance judgment shall be deemed " December 1, 2012."

From No. 4 of the first instance judgment, the phrase “the same fact as the blood transfusion within the brain room” from No. 13 to No. 16 of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “the fact that there is a high level of intensity of work on the part of the Plaintiff is merely 4-5 hours a day, and thus, it appears that there is no medical basis that there is a high level of work on the part of the Plaintiff.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.