However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 25, 2012, from around 22:00 to 06:43 of the following day, the Defendant discovered that the iron safe located in the office of the victim D, who performed an oiling work in the Daejeon Seo-gu E oil station operated by the victim D, was not locked, and that the Defendant stolen the amount of KRW 90,000,000 in cash owned by the victim and KRW 30,000 in the West-gu and KRW 8.790,000 in cash owned by the victim and KRW 30,000 in the Yellow-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of sentences] 1 month to 6 years [Scope of sentences] mitigated elements of punishment (a person who has been specially punished] / [Scope of recommending punishment] / thief crime group, theft (general larceny), mitigation area of general property, 4 months to 10 months [whether suspended sentence is suspended] - Main reasons for writing : Not recovery from damage - Principal reasons for writing - There are no major reasons for writing : living type crime - there is no criminal conviction for not less than a suspended sentence (decision of sentence] 6 months, by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years, by contingent crimes of suspended sentence 2 years, by no criminal conviction for the same kind, by minor amount of damage, and by recovering damage;