However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (a) D's franchise operated by Da in an infinite office operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul (Seoul) and the front of the vehicle number plate was kept in custody due to the unpaid fines for negligence; (b) forged two car number plates using a computer for the purpose of exercising, by means of transparent plastic packaging.

2. The Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), shall attach one of the forged motor vehicle number plates to the same year from February 22, 2015.

4.3. From the 22:22 to the 22:22, a forged air defense was exercised by operating a day-to-day project with the Mancheon-si, and at the same time a forged motor vehicle number plate was used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Order to deliver the seized automobile;

1. Application of each forged number plate and vehicle photographing statutes;

1. Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of counterfeited air) of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts; Articles 78 subparagraph 2 and 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act (the forgery of a registration number plate and an illegal use of a motor vehicle);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the crime of forging air and the crime of violating the Automobile Management Act due to the forgery of a registration number plate, the crime of forging air, the crime of violating the Automobile Management Act due to the use of a forged registration license plate, and the punishment provided for the crime of violating the Automobile Management Act with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the reason for sentencing as seen below) is that the Defendant was indicted of other crimes (Fraud) and filed an appeal after having been sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months in the first instance trial and having been sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence, and without being aware of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it in the course of the trial, but is contrary to the confession of the instant crime.