매매대금반환
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The key issue of this case in the judgment of the court of first instance is not only the seller of this case's sales contract, but also the defendant, the purchaser of this case, failed to implement the procedure necessary for the registration of transfer of ownership to the plaintiff, and also failed to perform the contractual obligation that the defendant has to prevent some of the members of the defendant from doing tinsan Development Counterclaim, and thus, whether the plaintiff can rescind the contract only by the peremptory notice of performance in writing. The reason of this judgment of the court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding or adding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence
After the second 10th of the judgment of the first instance court, “the plaintiff paid 100 million won as down payment to the defendant on the date of concluding the contract of this case” shall be added.
Then, in light of the Plaintiff’s attitude on the date of pleading and the overall purport of pleading at the date of pleading of this court, the Plaintiff appears to have changed the intention of the Plaintiff to purchase the instant land due to other internal circumstances of the Plaintiff, or other factors, such as the strict examination by the neighboring village residents or by the administrative agencies.”
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.