2. Taking into account the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is divided and the circumstances of the Defendant are difficult, and that there were circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the Defendant’s commission of the commission of the crime, even if the lower court appears to have already sentenced to a fine less than the fine for the summary order, taking into account the above circumstances, and thus, it appears that the lower court would have been sentenced to a fine less than the fine for the summary order. In full view of the fact that the crime of perjury obstructs the appropriate exercise of judgment authority, which is a judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantive truth, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.