2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected in the crime of this case, treatment of alcohol addiction and prevention of recidivism is conducted, and that human and physical damage has not occurred due to the driving without a license for drinking alcohol of this case.

However, it is recognized that the defendant had been punished three times including a suspended sentence due to the crime of driving without permission for the same kind of alcohol, and that the blood alcohol concentration of the defendant at the time of the instant case is relatively high by 0.139%.

In addition, in full view of the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the fact that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the lower court after the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.