손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants and the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff is modified as follows.
1. The judgment of the first instance court on the scope of the trial in this Court accepted all the counterclaim claims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff). Accordingly, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) did not appeal the part on the counterclaim claim. Therefore, only the remainder except the part on the counterclaim claim is subject to the judgment of the court in this Court.
2. The reasoning of the judgment in this case is as follows, except for the following additional changes, the part of the reasoning of the judgment in the first instance, with the exception of the judgment on the counterclaim claim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff). Therefore, this is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The 7th and 13th and 8th and above "AB" were each "AH" and "AH" were deleted from the 15th and 14th to the 14th and below "S," the 15th and 14th to the 14th and later, the 16th and 7th, "There was no relation to the construction of the building of this case," and the 16th and 16th, "the building of this case" was "the building of this case and the land of this case, the 14th and 14th and above 14th and above 8th and above "AH" were "AH," and the 8th and above 14th and above 14th and "the 19th and above 2th and above 14th and the 14th and above 14th and the 16th and above 19th and the 2nd and above 10th and the 1910th and above 10th and the 2nd and above 1010th and the 10th and the 10th and above 191010.