2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on April 1, 200 and promoted to the Inspector on March 1, 2012, and served as an inspector in the B police station from February 1, 2012 (hereinafter “B”)’s office as of February 1, 2012.

B. From September 2, 2015 to September 4, 2015, the Plaintiff performed the duties of an inspector of the instant shooting range conducted in the indoor shooting range of the C police station (hereinafter “instant shooting training”).

C. On September 14, 2015, the recycling garbage classification work collected by the C police station was conducted on September 19, 2015 on the secondhands D located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and a paper case was discovered that contained 35 ball cartridges in the garbage.

The results of the investigation conducted in the hearing and audit office of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, B, and the inspection office of the National Police Agency related to the loss of ball cartridges were confirmed to have been lost during the shooting training of this case.

The Plaintiff is a “observer of a shooting range,” and the Plaintiff must finally verify the identity of the shooting range during shooting training, including a comparison for verifying the identification card of the shooting range, and shall clarify the prevention of unlawful acts, such as acting shooting, and the inspection of the recovery of ball cartridges management and carbon, from September 2, 2015 to September 2, 2015.

9.4.In the second half of the year operated in the indoor shooting range of Seoul C, during the regular shooting range:

9. On April 15:10, immediately after the shooting of Article 54 (6) was terminated, “the shooting level has been terminated” from Gyeong-man and Assistant E (department in charge of education) shall hear only horses, and shall leave approximately 20 minutes of personal-use shooting ranges, such as toilets, without a separate verification procedure, and among them, E and shooting assistant personnel instructed “I left the blank, so I did not prevent unlawful acts, such as slope F, etc., by ordering 8 persons, including slope F, etc. to “I would have left the open space, so I would have not done so.” After the shooting was terminated, I would like to write down and sign the “actual receipt book” and “I would have not confirmed the number of carbon recovered,” and without confirming the number of carbon recovered.