However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 23, 2012, around 00:55 on September 23, 2012, at the D convenience points in Seopoposi C, two persons, including the F details belonging to the E Zone of the Seopopool Police Station E Zone, have been reported by the Defendant, such as viewing the urine on the roadway in the junc road under the influence of alcohol.

The Defendant, on the ground that the above F F was frighting and soliciting him to return home, set up the 3.8 gun, which was set up on the side of the outer leather, and turned down on the 3.8 gun, which was set up on the side of the outer leather.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of police officer's patrol duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act leads to this case, even though the defendant had been punished for the same crime, and the act in this case leads to this case. It is decided as per Disposition in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the police officer did not cause any other damage to the defendant, and that the defendant's depth reflects the defendant's depth, in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant.