2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On May 22, 2017, the Plaintiff was a daily worker of Company B, as one of the activities connecting the beams moved by another workshop at the site of officetels and new construction of neighborhood living facilities located in Ischeon-si, Leecheon-si, and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant after undergoing a diagnosis of “the full-frequency of the front kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-man kne-

B. On October 20, 2017, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff on the ground that the causal link between the instant accident and the instant accident was recognized with respect to the Plaintiff’s “all-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-half-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one (hereinafter “the instant disposition”). However, the Defendant rendered a decision not to approve the instant accident due to the fact that there was no causal link between the instant accident and the instant accident (hereinafter “the instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff got knee knee knee knee knee kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee