2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The status of the parties is C's birth and the defendant is C's children, and the plaintiff and the defendant are C's relationship with C's children.

B. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Plaintiff’s name on May 13, 1985, on the grounds of the sale as of August 6, 1996, when the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of 546 square meters and 1,200 square meters prior to the Gyeong-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, which owned real estate H with the real estate indicated in the attached Table 1, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of 1,200 square meters prior to the above F on October 7, 200 and 1,200 square meters prior to the Defendant’s name. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of 1,196 square meters prior to the F on October 7, 2009 (the real estate indicated in the attached Table 1) and 4 square meters prior to J. 1,894 square meters and 1,31,381 square meters and 198 square meters, respectively, under the name of Da.

On July 15, 2005, the above K-gun 1,894 square meters was divided into 1,881 square meters and n. 3 square meters. On August 14, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of H, as in paragraph (2) below 546 square meters prior to I on August 14, 2012, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff again. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in combination with 331 square meters and 1,48 square meters in the above L-Ba, 31 square meters, and 1,48 square meters in the above M-Ba, and the registration of ownership transfer was divided into 3,086 square meters in K-si and 1,160 square meters in G on July 19, 2013 (attached Table 2) and divided into 300 square meters in the name of each of the Defendant’s real estate registered in the name of 13.25

C. On November 20, 2012, C and the Defendant’s assaulted on the Plaintiff’s wife D on November 20, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s wife visited C’s house to prepare for food for life saving prior to the 2012 drilling, and the Plaintiff’s wife did not engage in life saving on the ground that he did not properly engage in personnel management.