난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 1, 200, the Plaintiff entered and departed from the Republic of Pakistan on several occasions from the first entry into the Republic of Korea on May 1, 200 as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), and on June 13, 2011, entered the Republic of Korea as a status of stay for corporate investment (D-8 and 90 days of sojourn) and filed an application for recognition of refugee with the Defendant on November 3, 2011.
(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.
On November 18, 2013, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).
On December 23, 2013, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on April 11, 2014.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s assertion that it is a hydrophamina, as the Punjab, from the Punjb. The Plaintiff’s ground for appeal is a hydrophamina.
The father B of the plaintiff was killed on August 10, 2003, when he operated the company manufacturing sports products from around 1958 to Si in the joint name of 3 siblings and from around 1958 (the joint name was the joint name and actually operated by B).
After that, the above company closed its business, and approximately approximately approximately KRW 22 million, the above sports product site (hereinafter "the factory site of this case") was left unattended as it is.
On May 23, 2011, the Plaintiff, who was staying in the Republic of Korea, visited Pakistan for the purpose of viewing his/her family. C of this case.