However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 17, 2019, the Defendant: (a) from around 15:25 to around 16:03, the victim C (Nam, 32 years old); (b) demanded that the victim C (Nam, 32 years old), purchased at another place, and refused the request, thereby hindering the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as: (c) “I am back to the outside of the inside”, “I am back to the outside of the inside; (d) I am out of the place where the police officer dispatched upon receipt of a report, I am out of the door and ples, and sound; and (e) I am out of the door and scar; (e) I am out of the body where the police officer dispatched after receiving a report, I am sound; and (e) interfere with the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as preventing customers from entering the convenience store.

On May 10, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on May 17, 2020, the victim F (n, 43 years of age) who is his spouse, and a dispute with money problems, etc. on the road in front of Daegu Dong-gu E-gu, Daegu-gu, and the victim's face, which is going beyond the victim's face, was turned out by the string of the victim, etc., the left side of the snow is turned out, and the right eye of the victim was string, etc., and the number of days of treatment, etc., to the extent that it is impossible for the victim to walk out

Summary of Evidence

[200 Highest 166]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement of the police officer, a photograph of a stib video-fashion and a report processing table of 112 reported cases [20 high group 2941];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Six copies of a photograph of damaged part of the victim, and a list of reported cases;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act - The defendant was punished for the same kind of punishment and a crime of foreign origin on several occasions (including the actual sentence), and on February 9, 2018, the Daegu District Court has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for business obstruction, etc., and the probation period may be suspended several times.