However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 05:00 on January 20, 2018, the Defendant rendered a meeting, such as the victim D(49) at C main points located in the window B of Changwon-si around 05:00, and had a terminal dispute with the victim, which is a remaining issue of remaining business, and had a group of 500c head-fp, which is a dangerous object on the table, and had a group of 50c head-fp, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on requests for appraisal;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is not good in terms of the nature of the crime in this case, even though there are multiple criminal records of the same kind and similar crimes, but not good in terms of the crime in this case, such as the fact that the crime is committed, the victim does not want punishment by mutual consent with the victim and the victim