The relevant Plaintiff (the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. before the change; hereinafter “E”) is a company established for advertisement planning and agency business, and a member G of the National Assembly belonging to the F Party before holding 9.6% of the Plaintiff’s shares.

E or the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant local election”) and the KK’s general election (hereinafter “instant general election”) were in charge of promoting the election of L parties or F party candidates at H date I (hereinafter “instant general election”).

Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a media company that issues Internet newspapers “M” and “N” in a comprehensive daily newspaper.

Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) is a media company that broadcasts “D”, a general programming broadcasting company.

Defendant C (former Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a media company that publishes online newspapers, and is a company that publishes press articles reported by Defendant D on the P website.

On July 17, 2012, Defendant B published Articles 2 and 2 of [T] [Attachment 2] written by Q and R [S] in the Internet newspaper “M] prepared by Defendant B, as well as Articles 2 and 2 of the [Attachment 1] written by Q to N in the comprehensive daily newspaper “N.”

제1, 2 기사에는 각 검찰 수사 결과 원고가 자신이 홍보를 담당한 선거에서 선거비용을 부풀리기 위한 매뉴얼까지 만들어 조직적으로 국고를 빼돌려온 것으로 확인되었고, 매뉴얼을 활용해 작성된 ‘뻥튀기 청구서’ 리스트도 압수하는 등 입증자료가 이미 다 확보되어 있다는 내용(이하 ‘① 부분’이라 한다), 검찰에서 ‘이르면 다음주(2012. 7. 말경)’ 중에 G를 소환 조사할 방침이라는 내용(이하 ‘② 부분’이라 한다), 이 사건 지방선거 외에도 E이 2005년 설립된 이후 맡았던 모든 선거홍보 업무에서도...