However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 4, 2017, when the Defendant received a notice of penalty payment due to a scambing from the E officer belonging to the police station of the Gunsan Police Station, called out after receiving a report of scambling in front of the week C located in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, and received a notice of payment of penalty due to the scambing from the E officer belonging to the police station of the Gunsan Police Station, which was called out after receiving a report of scambling on April 23, 2017, the Defendant was able to use the scambling, scam, snow tank, and volunteer service.

“I sweared as “,” and took the floor of the hand, at one time, the face part of E.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant commits a crime against his/her own mistake and has no record of committing a crime beyond a fine).