However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Grandroth.

Around 05:55 on May 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was negligent in the course of duties, without temporarily suspending the intersection in front of the D cafeteria located in Seopo-si, Seopo-si from the upper East-si to the parallel of Changcheon Elementary Schools; (b) the part of the front offender in front of the said parallel of vehicles, which was left left at the right ethro from the center of Changcheon-ro to the upper-dong of the victim E (e.g., 67 years old) who was under the right ethn-ray driver’s seat and body, and was in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment; (c) the Defendant sustained injury such as the wall typ in front of the D cafeteria; (d) the victim G (e.g., f9 years old) who was driven by the Defendant, and was in need of approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment; (d) the victim was 7 years old in the same eth of the victim’s ethym.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative at the option of punishment (the size of a traffic accident is heavy, the number of victims is many, and the liability for violating signals is heavy);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the reflects on the nature of a motor vehicle, the fact that a motor vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the first offender);