However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:50 on April 19, 2013, the Defendant was indicted to the effect that “C had the face of Victim D, who is an engineer driving on behalf of drinking, taken once again,” and had been present as a witness in the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Driver Violence, etc.) against Defendant C, 2013Ka-Ma2148, which was pending in trial, at the time of the appearance of assaulting the said D in the above column vehicle, and had been present in the witness in the above column, the Defendant was willing to have not committed the above assault for the purpose of friendly arrest C.

At around 16:00 on December 23, 2013, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the case No. 2013Ma2148 of the Suwon District Court located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant answer to the question "I do not ask the defense counsel "I do not ask the defendant (C) at the time that the defendant (C) would make the right face of the victim (D) who is driving on the back seat one time to the right drinking of the defendant (C) at the time," and continuously answer the question "I have the fact that there was an assault or assault of an acting engineer on the part of the defendant (C)".

However, at around 17:50 on April 19, 2013, C had been aware of the fact that he had observed the above D face on one occasion at the back of the driver's seat of the above vehicle while she was drinking alcohol at the time of drinking alcohol at the Defendant and she was driving a substitute driver, and the Defendant was driving the vehicle at the time of drinking at the driver's seat of the above vehicle at the time of drinking, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that she told C, which was going on the back of the top of the driver's seat of the above vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. The third trial records and each protocol of examination of a witness, which are prescribed in subparagraph 2, 2013 or 2148;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (attached to a written conviction againstC);

1. The corresponding provisions of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; and