A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and fines of twenty-seven thousand,00,000 won, Defendant B with fines of twenty thousand,00,000 won, and Defendant C with fines of thirty thousand,00 won.

Defendant A is an employee belonging to the department of the Incheon Urban Corporation located in 42 914, as the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, who takes charge of the management of the property of the site on the Yeonsu-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City (7,400 square meters), which is owned by the Incheon Urban Corporation (Gu Incheon Metropolitan City Tourism Corporation).

Defendant

B is a person who is engaged in a sub-lease business for the above site under the trade name of the Incheon Urban Corporation and the above K site, and the defendant C is a person who is in charge of the affairs of the above sub-lease on behalf of the defendant C.

Defendant

B At the time of March 2011, Defendant A and Defendant A, who were in charge of the management of the property for the land of 19,637 square meters (7,400 square meters) in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City under the jurisdiction of the Incheon Metropolitan City Tourism Corporation, have entered into a loan contract with Defendant A and Defendant A, who paid KRW 7,125,00 per month as the fee and used the said site as the fee and used it.

However, Defendant B, subject to a loan agreement, limited the purpose of the above K site to be used as “warehouse”, and despite the prohibition of sub-lease to a third party, Defendant B had other companies hold office at a price lower than the market price in violation of the above terms and conditions and had other companies use the above site for their business purposes, and was paid from KRW 30 million to KRW 40 million per month.

After all, Defendant B received notification from the Incheon Urban Corporation around June 2013 that “The sublease of the above site is in violation of the contract, and it would not renew the loan contract if the sub-lease company is not removed.” As such, Defendant B could no longer obtain profit by sub-leaseing the above site to a third party, Defendant A, who is in charge of the management of the property of the above site, would be required to renew the loan contract for the above site from the Incheon Urban Corporation and make it possible to get profit by sub-lease the above site in the same way as before.