2. In full view of the elements of unfavorable sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable, even if the Defendant had been subject to criminal punishment twice as a drunk driving in 2014, and had had the history of being punished for two times prior to that, and thus, re-driving and driving without a license, and the Defendant’s economic condition is not good at the time of the instant crime, such as the fact that the blood alcohol level at the time of the instant crime was 0.170%.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.