beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.11.09 2018가합968

근저당권말소

Text

1. The defendant on December 12, 1992 pertaining to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim

A. The following facts are acknowledged in light of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 6 (including those with serial numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

1) The Plaintiff’s respective real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) for the purpose of securing obligations, such as liquor payments, etc.

2) As to the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) as to the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) is not set at the duration of the right to collateral security or the term for the settlement of the secured obligation, and the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) is set at the same Government District Court 20,000,000 won and the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”).

(2) On June 20, 1995, the registration of the establishment of a mortgage over the defendant was completed, and on June 20, 1995, the maximum debt amount of KRW 330,00,000,000 with the maximum debt amount of KRW 5894,000, the career of the mortgagee, the defendant, and the career cuber Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the subsequent merger to the

2) The registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter each of the above mortgages is referred to as the "each of the above mortgages of this case" and the registration of the establishment of a new neighboring mortgage of this case is referred to as the "registration of

(2) On July 18, 2003, when the defendant agreed on the division ratio of the shares of the rights to the goods secured by co-ownership with the defendant on July 18, 2003, as of May 31, 2003, the defendant's share in the right is transferred to all of the defendant's shares in the security of a trade line with the defendant's claim of 0 persons, and the agreement became final and conclusive as 0%.

around May 2018, 3 career and career coos agreed with the Plaintiff to terminate each of the instant collective security rights, and issued documents necessary to cancel the collective security right to the Plaintiff.

B. The mortgagee of the right to collateral security may claim the extinction of the right to collateral security after the debt has been determined, within the scope of the maximum debt amount.

The duration of the right to collateral security; or