업무방해등
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
The victim B is a person who operates the 'D' 'D' 'D' in leisure time, and the defendant is a customer who requested the 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D
On April 4, 2016, from around 16:15 to around 18:13 the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by showing the attitude that the Defendant separated the string support pipe pipe from the process of protesting for the deletion of the victim’s 'D’ 'D management’ to January 15, 2016, and the tampers’ photographs taken from the victim B’s stedra to January 15, 2016.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for B and E;
1. - Application of the laws and subordinate statutes to the DNA Stewardship ctv video material CD1, investigation report (ctv video material photographs attached thereto).
1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;
1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The part dismissing the public prosecution pursuant to Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the crime is recognized and reflected, the fact that the injured person in agreement with the injured person does not want the punishment against the accused, the circumstance leading to the crime of this case, such as the deletion of a sweet’s sweet’s photo, etc., and there are no history of criminal punishment)
1. On April 4, 2016, from around 16:15 to around 18:13 of the same day, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (43) who is an engineer of the above Pidio photo from the 'DD' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D' 'D'
2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the same Act.