수용보상금증액청구
1. The part of the Plaintiff B’s claim for compensation against the headingler is dismissed.
2. The defendant,
A. The plaintiff A.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Business Approval and Public Notice - Construction Work on Expressway (D, hereinafter “instant project”) - Project Operator published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs ( December 30, 2009): Defendant
B. The Plaintiffs owned the relevant land as indicated in the “Before subdivision” column as indicated below, but due to the instant project, the land was divided as indicated in the following table.
After the partition of land before the landowner’s partition, Plaintiff A Dong-si F (hereinafter the same applies.) had been subject to G orchard 33,874 square meters G 21,344 square meters G orchard 21,343 square meters G orchard 21,343 square meters, and 6,015 square meters of G orchard 3,016 square meters, K orchard 2,507 square meters (Expropriation) before Plaintiff B L, 6,112 square meters of 2,612 square meters of 2,618 square meters prior to 956 square meters of 2,538 square meters of 2,574 square meters prior to 796 square meters prior to the subdivision of land before the partition, Plaintiff B had been subject to the rectification of the boundary on July 8, 2012 (Expropriation), 1,428 square meters of Q forest and Q forest, and registration conversion (registration).
R Forest land: 473m2 (Expropriation)
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation by December 16, 201 - Plaintiff B subject to the expropriation ruling by the Central Land Tribunal: The Plaintiff B: J-gun 3,016 square meters, K orchard 2,507 square meters (the part indicated in the “after the division of land” in the above table : The part indicated in the column 2,538 square meters, P prior to 778 square meters, and Ran Forest land 473 square meters (the portion indicated in the column “after the division of land”) and its obstacles - Compensation for Land Compensation (see attached Form 1 real estate compensation in the column of the adjudication on expropriation: The Plaintiff B: The land compensation amount of KRW 95,537,500, 119,361,00 won, the compensation amount of land compensation amount of KRW 119,361,00, the land compensation amount of KRW 280,000, the remaining portion of the land shall be dismissed or the remaining portion of the land appraisal corporation (the appraisal corporation’s of this case shall be dismissed.