2. The plaintiff's claim against the above cancellation portion is dismissed.

3.

The reasoning for this part of the court's explanation was that "I, while filing a counterclaim, make a detailed claim through modification of the purport of the claim in accordance with the result of physical examination after drilling," the second 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance stated "I," "I," "I," "I," "I," "I," "I," "I," "I," "I," "I, 318,905, paid 7,318,905 won for medical expenses at an E hospital, etc. where the accident occurred in large exhibition for the treatment of the injured part of the accident in this case, I," "I," "I," after dividing the medical expenses to be borne by the insurer and the principal," "I," "I," and "I," the third 9 of the judgment of the court of first 200,000 won for the medical expenses claimed by the plaintiff," and "I, "I, 318,905," and "I, 401,05,00.

The main point of the plaintiff's assertion was that the plaintiff received medical treatment due to the accident in this case, and directly paid the principal's share out of the medical expenses, and the insurer's share was aware that the defendant guaranteed the payment to the hospital.

However, the defendant did not guarantee the payment of the plaintiff's medical expenses, and refused to pay the insurer's expenses to the E Hospital. Ultimately, the plaintiff additionally paid the insurer's expenses of KRW 10,000,000 to the E Hospital.

Therefore, the defendant who entered into a mutual aid agreement with B is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount equivalent to the medical expenses to be borne by the above insurer related to the accident of this case.

The Plaintiff is the Defendant.