Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On August 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on August 13, 2018, 2018, the Defendant, while returning home under the influence of alcohol, sent a woman-friendly room and a fluence to the corridor, reported that neighboring residents are able to share food delivery and fluence in the corridor; and (b) led them to a string the string of the string, leading the string of food in the corridor.

Since then, the Defendant 112 reported by neighboring residents, she was able to see the horses due to a scam from a slope D belonging to the police box of the previous U.S. police station C, and thus, she was able to see the horses to be broken, and she was able to see to D, “I am fright, scam, scams, scams, scams, and scams, 9 level 9 level 9 level 9 level 9 level 7 level 7 level 7 level amscams,” while she expressed D’s face to her, she scams, scam, scams, and d, she was fched.

D intimidationd the body of D, such as intending to injure the body of D, by speaking that bitch bitch bitch is not same, farced, farced, died only, etc.

Defendant spits in the patrol car in the process of arresting D as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties by threatening D as above, and taking them into custody through Cmpination of the old police station, thereby threatening D as if it would inflict bodily harm on D.

As a result, the defendant threatened D who is a police officer, thereby hindering D's legitimate execution of duties concerning D's 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (referring to actions, etc. conducted after arrest of the suspect), on-site photo, list of reported cases handled by 112, and Category C police box service;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of interference with and intimidation, reflects the fact that it is an contingent crime, and D are the accused.