2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects his mistake, the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim for the first time in the trial, the degree of injury of the victim is minor, the defendant is not an out-of-the-counter farmer, and the defendant does not faithfully live and does not repeat the crime.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim without any reason. In addition, in full view of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court cannot be determined to be unreasonable merely because the Defendant’s punishment was imposed on 11 occasions (4 times of actual punishment, 4 times of suspended sentence, 11 times of suspended sentence, 6 times of fine). Moreover, the Defendant’s crime of this case was committed again 4 months since he/she was discharged from the prison or a tea, and 1 year and 3 months of punishment was committed in the same kind of crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.