사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On September 11, 2015, the Defendant was released on May 13, 2016, and the remaining term of imprisonment has expired on June 8, 2016 while he/she was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court.
[2] On May 18, 2016, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 5,389,” connected to the Internet NAVV and sold ice powder on the bulletin board of the place.
Publicationing a letter to the effect that “the remittance of money is made first” to the victim C who reported and contacted the above article, and “the remittance of money will be made in advance.”
“Falsely speaking to the effect that it is “......”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a ice to send to the victim, and there was no intention or ability to send the said ice to the victim even if he received money from the victim for daily expenses and used it as a means of living, and did not send the said pro rata to the victim. Thus, even if he received money from the victim under the above pretext, he did not have the intention or ability to send the pro rata
In addition, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and received 16,000 won under the name of the business bank account (D) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the damaged person, from that time, from that time, for the sale proceeds of distributed money.
8. Until March 13, 200, the victims received total of KRW 2,686,000 from the victims over 53 occasions, such as the statement in the list of crimes in annexed Table 1.
"2016 Highest 5964"
1. On August 11, 2016, the Defendant, who committed the crime against the victim E, posted a letter stating that “a mobile phone is sold at gallon 3 mobile phones” on a bulletin board by accessing the Internet NAVV to a high-class country camera, and a mobile phone is sold to the victim E who reported and contacted the above letter.
1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”
However, the defendant sent to the victim
The intention or ability to sell the mobile phone even if he/she did not have the mobile phone and receives the money from the injured party, and he/she thought that he/she will use it as the cost of living.