2. The judgment of the defendant was made in the first instance, and the defendant appeared to have an attitude of reflecting his mistake, and the fact that there was no criminal record for the same kind of offense is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in the course of trial expenses due to the change of the vehicle line of the defendant while driving, and the nature of the crime is weak, but there was no agreement with the victim or restoration of damage.

The defendant has a history of punishment of fines on several occasions.

Considering the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.