A. The Plaintiff is the owner of B (C) vehicle (hereinafter “victimd vehicle”) after the alteration, and the Defendant A is the owner of D (hereinafter “A”) and the Defendant’s Federation of Trucking Transport Services (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is the insurer who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the AB vehicle.

B. At around 09:15 on March 2, 2014, G was driving a damaged vehicle in the five-lane road near the Friju Station E (hereinafter “instant road”) located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and H was driving the damaged vehicle thereafter.

(The current status and damage of the road of this case and the progress of the vehicle of this sea shall be referred to as the attached picture).In order to proceed to the road of this case as a hand-on room, the road of this case shall proceed to the five-lane and go to the right side of the safety zone. In order to proceed to the road of this case, it shall proceed to the four-lane and go to the left side of the safety zone.

Then, while G and H trying to proceed to a flood control zone, they go along the three-lanes of the road in this case and go through the entrance of the current flood control zone, and they changed the four-lanes to the four-lanes of the current flood control zone for the fruit bank, and they invaded the safety zone in order to enter the current flood control zone into the current flood control zone.

(See the progress of the damaged and damaged vehicle. As above, the damaged vehicle driven by G was invaded by the safety zone and at the same time the damaged vehicle driven by H, which is proceeding at a speed exceeding 130 km per hour, was shocked by the rear of the damaged vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

Judgment

According to the above facts, the accident of this case is basically negligent in performing the duty of H in front of the week, and due to an excessive negligence, the defendant A as the owner of the harming vehicle, and the defendant federation as the insurer of the harming vehicle.