beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.05.14 2019나15893

손해배상(기)

Text

Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid under the order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On February 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around February 12, 2018, on an advertisement banner with the size of 600 cm in width and 70 cm in length as indicated “D” on the designated display stand for the banner of the Cridge at Incheon-si (hereinafter “instant banner”).

(2) On February 27, 2018, the Defendant filed a report on the extension of the display period from February 27, 2018 to March 13, 2018. (2) At the time of reporting the extension of the display period of the instant banner, the instant banner was somewhat ssoned to the designated display stand.

The defendant known the above facts to the person in charge of the E-Myeon Office, and the person in charge confirmed to the purport that he should set the banner of this case to the defendant on a short basis.

However, the defendant, alone, thought that it is difficult to fix the banner of this case, and set up the banner of this case with a temporary display.

3) On March 5, 2018, at around 14:18, the Plaintiff driven the front road of the above designated display stand, from the room of the office of the E-Myeon in the e-mail of the city of Y, the Plaintiff, while one string of the instant banner strings by wind, lost the center by facing the Plaintiff’s face, and returned back together with the above stalb (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

(ii)for this reason, there has been an injury in need of 8 weeks of medical treatment, such as cutting down the right-hand part of the front wall. [Grounds for recognition] Evidence A 1 to 4, evidence B, and evidence B (which include a number of pages 1 to 2; hereinafter the same shall apply)

- The purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, although the defendant has a duty of care to install the instant banner solidly so as not to be separated from the designated display stand, the instant banner was excluded from the designated display stand due to negligence, and accordingly, the accident of this case is determined to have occurred.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

(c) limitation of liability;