However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On February 10, 2018, at around 13:47, the Defendant parked a vehicle in front of the convenience store in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, on the ground that the victim D (47 taxes) parked in the street, and the victim took the face of the victim by digital camera which the Defendant was in possession, and the victim demanded several times to keep his/her face from the front wheel, and then, he/she took the front wheel of the Defendant’s front wheel, which is a dangerous object with the above front wheel, and caused the injury of the victim by gathering the part of the victim’s face one time in front of the convenience store in Sungnam-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of shots);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 53 and subparag. 55 subparag. 13 of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2001Da14488, Apr. 2, 201) (see, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da1488, Apr. 2, 2

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (wholly considering the favorable circumstances) of the suspended execution;