beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.10.24 2018가단2461

자동차소유권이전등록절차인수

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff issued a certificate of personal seal impression, etc. to the effect that “the Plaintiff may receive a loan from a vehicle with a heavy-sized vehicle in the name of the Plaintiff” from a motor vehicle dealer of a middle-sized seller. However, on March 28, 2014, the Plaintiff only registered the transfer of ownership in the name of the Plaintiff as to the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and did not receive any money for the instant vehicle loan.

As a result of the confirmation of the details of automobile insurance coverage, it is confirmed that the defendant purchased the automobile of this case during the period from April 25, 2015 to July 1, 2015, and therefore, it can be seen that the defendant received the automobile of this case. Thus, the defendant is obliged to take over the transfer registration procedure for the automobile of this case from the plaintiff.

2. According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 2, the fact that the defendant purchased the automobile insurance of this case during the insurance period from April 25, 2015 to July 1, 2015 is recognized.

However, even if the plaintiff suffered fraud, it is insufficient to recognize that the defendant acquired the automobile of this case merely because the details of purchase of automobile insurance exist in the future of the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.