However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 24, 2016, the Defendant sent a telephone to “120 Dasan Call Center,” which is a general civil petition center in Seoul, operated by a private enterprise entrusted by the Seoul Metropolitan Government by using his/her mobile phone on August 24, 2016, and received the call from the victim B, who is a counselor of the above call center, to whom he/she responded.

C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. H. H. H. and C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. c. c. f. c. f. c. c. f. c. f. c. c. f. c. c. f. c. f. c. c. f. c. c. f. c. c. f. c. f. c. f. c. f. c. f. f. f. f. f. f.

From that time to November 24, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the victim B, C, D, E, F, G, and H, a counselor of the call center, by the same method seven times in total, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the victim;

1. A complaint form and a list of crimes;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the production of tape-recording files;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act of the community service order is against the defendant's attempt to commit the instant crime.

A defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime.

However, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

Even if the act of the defendant can not be used only by the reason of the separation.

The extent of verbal abuse committed by the defendant to a call center counselor is serious.

The defendant is not only one time but also the same crime several times and is suspected of habitually committing the same crime.

On the same act as the defendant committed.