2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion concluded a contract with the Defendant for the supply of a piece of goods and supplied a piece of goods equivalent to KRW 46,657,700 by February 18, 2012. However, the Plaintiff received KRW 14 million from the Defendant. However, the Defendant claimed for the remaining supply price of goods and damages for delay.

B. Although it was true that the Defendant’s assertion made a single-use supply transaction with the Plaintiff’s husband C, the Defendant paid all remainder of KRW 12 million until May 16, 2013 after the transaction was completed around August 2008.

2. In light of the reasoning of the judgment below, the Defendant’s statement No. 1 alone is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion that the remaining amount of supplied goods to the Plaintiff is KRW 32,657,700, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, according to the evidence No. 3-2, according to the Defendant’s statement No. 3-2, it is recognized that the Defendant paid KRW 12,00,000 to the Plaintiff side 24 times from August 18, 2008 to May 16, 2013, and thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.