beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.08 2016고단521

사문서위조등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. On August 201, the Defendant: (a) did not have obtained consent to the cancellation of the right to collateral security under the name of C and D with respect to the right to collateral security under the name of C and created by the Defendant with money borrowed and invested; and (b) did not have obtained consent to the cancellation of the right to collateral security under the name of C and D with respect to the right to collateral security under the name of D and with respect to the right to collateral security established by C and D; and (c) did not intend to obtain a new tenant’s consent to cancel the right to collateral security under the name of C and D with respect to the right to collateral security under the name of C and with respect to the right to collateral security under the name of C and with respect to the right to collateral security under the name of C, which was established on September 2, 2009; and (d) requested the cancellation of the right to collateral security under the name of C and the maximum amount of the right to collateral security under the name of C and the right to collateral security under the name of C, which was established on September 13, 16, 20014.

1) The Defendant, on August 201, 201, has, without authority, an employee in the name of the above E or E without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her private document at a place where a police officer was not located in the company: the power of attorney or the indication of real estate:

1. Buildings, the Gyeonggi-do G, the grounds for registration, and their dates: The purpose of cancellation and cancellation of each month: He/she shall be terminated on a monthly basis, and the cancellation and cancellation of the neighboring mortgage: He/she has made under 319288, which was received on September 09, 2009;