도박장소개설
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (10 months of imprisonment, confiscation, confiscation, confiscation, confiscation, and defendant C: 6 months of imprisonment, 8 months of imprisonment) declared by the court below to the defendants is too unreasonable.
2. Such circumstances are acknowledged as follows: (a) the Defendants recognized their mistakes and reflects them; (b) Defendant A has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (c) Defendant B has no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and (d) Defendant B has a relatively auxiliary role; and (c) Defendant C has made efforts to treat the symptoms of gambling addiction.
However, the crime of gambling is highly harmful to the general public, such as promoting an excessive gambling spirit and failure in home economy. Among them, it is necessary to strictly punish many persons who are suffering from gambling addiction. Each of the crimes of this case is established a place for gambling with strong gambling by sharing each role of Defendant A and B, and Defendant C habitually gambling. The total amount of money of 85,609,000 won in the gambling house of this case was 40 persons and 30 minutes in total. Defendant A took the leading role in opening the gambling house of this case; Defendant B was punished twice the same kind of gambling crime; Defendant C had no record of punishment for the same kind of gambling crime; Defendant C had no record of punishment for the same kind of gambling crime; Defendant C had no record of punishment for the same kind of gambling crime; Defendant C had no record of punishment for the same kind of gambling crime; Defendant C had no reason to view the circumstances of the crime; Defendant C’s circumstances and circumstances that were favorable to the crime; Defendant C had no reason to view it as being unfair after the crime; Defendant C’s age and circumstances.
3. Thus, the defendants' appeal is justified.