beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단6586

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant shall be liable for 31,00 won by fraud to the applicant C, and the applicant E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant posted a notice to sell Chinese money to the Internet Nenebber Kafa, China around April 15, 2016, and made a false statement that the Defendant sold KRW 480,000 to the victim F in contact with the Defendant.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods.

The Defendant, as above, received 480,000 won from the victim who was believed to be true, from the victim, and received 480,000 won from the H account of the National Bank in G name on April 15, 2016.

On June 4, 2016, the Defendant sent a false statement to the victim I who contacted the Internet site with the content that he/she sold entitenized more than the exchange rate of a commercial bank at the Internet site "China country" and sent a false statement to the victim I who had contacted the Internet site with the content that he/she sold entitenized more than the exchange rate of a commercial bank.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to send the internationalization to the victim even if he received money from the victim because he did not hold the internationalization.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 745,00 on June 7, 2016 from the one bank account (Account NumberJ) in the name of the Defendant from the victim, and received KRW 10,60,000 in total on three occasions on September 12, 2016, as well as from September 20, 2016 until September 20, 2016.

On March 21, 2016, the Defendant up to 2016, posted a notice stating that he would sell the volume to the Internet K market site, and then falsely sent the price to the victim K, who reported it first, to the victim K, with the intention to send it to the door-to-door.

However, since the defendant did not have the above goods, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the goods.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such.