2. The judgment is a favorable condition to the defendant that the defendant reflects his mistake and repents, that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime, and that there is a old parent and child who should support.

However, the administration of narcotics is highly likely to be subject to punishment as serious crimes detrimental to the social and national soundness due to their toxicity. Two years and eight months have elapsed since the date of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s final entry into Korea on January 31, 2013, which led to the Defendant’s evaluation of narcotics at the end of two months or more from January 31, 2013, and the Defendant’s response to the Defendant’s conspiracy is deemed to have occurred, unlike the Defendant’s change of address, suspected of addiction to Mempis, unlike the Defendant’s change of address, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of one sentence, one suspended sentence, one suspended sentence, and one repeated offense, and other factors under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, which are the conditions for sentencing, in light of the records and arguments in this case, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.