A. The sentence of the lower court (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. If there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the court below, and the sentencing of the court below does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(2) In light of the fact that the victim’s family members were unable to recover damage by any way that is favorable to the defendant, even though the victim’s family members did not want the punishment of the defendant, the court below determined that the victim’s family members did not have any mental suffering or mental suffering from the crime of this case before he/she committed the crime of this case, and that there was a motive to commit the crime of this case in order not to cause any pain to the child, and that there was a significant difficulty in economic difficulties, etc., the defendant’s attempt to support the victim whose dementia had been aggravated since he/she committed the crime of this case since he/she did not have any mental suffering from the crime of this case. The defendant appears to have selected the method of committing the crime of this case as long as he/she did not have any criminal record exceeding the suspension of execution, and that the victim’s family members did not want the punishment of the defendant. However, considering the fact that the victim’s family members did not want the punishment of this case, the victim appears to have suffered considerable pain or mental suffering from the crime of this case.