On May 19, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim AM, stating, “I think that I will conduct entertainment store business, and I would like to lend money with the need to pay money. I would like to pay I would like to pay I would like to.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was a bad credit holder at the time, and there was no particular property, and there was no idea to conduct entertainment store business, and there was no idea to use the money received from the injured person as an individual, so even if he received the money from the injured person, he did not have any intention or ability to change it.

The Defendant received five million won from the injured party, namely, five million won from the seat, from the time to June 22, 2015, in total, 13 million won from the time as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against AM;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and reports on the results of previous convictions;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Although there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has no criminal conviction for the reason of sentencing, the defendant has the same criminal conviction, and each of the of the of the of the of the of the of the crimes in this case has no criminal conviction, in light of the method and result of the crime, the nature and circumstances of the crime in light of the crime and the result thereof, and the fact that no agreement has been reached between the victim even after the considerable period of time has elapsed after the crime was committed, and all of the circumstances, such as the motive and circumstance of each of the crimes in this case, after the crime,