1. Defendant A’s grounds for appeal should be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, the selection of evidence and the probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact-finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court (Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court: (1) Defendant A engaged in engaging in engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic in collusion with Defendant A co-defendant B, etc., while operating the instant massage clinic in collusion with Defendant B, etc.

(2) The facts charged in this case are not identical to those of the crime, such as violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, which became final and conclusive on December 26, 2013.

Based on its different premise, the Defendant did not accept the Defendant’s assertion of misapprehension of the legal doctrine that a judgment of acquittal should be rendered on the criminal facts until December 26, 2013.

The grounds of appeal disputing the lower court’s factual recognition are merely grounds for the lower court’s determination on the choice of evidence and probative value, which belongs to the free judgment of the fact-finding court. In addition, even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the identity and universal offense of facts, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, contrary to logical and empirical rules.

2. As to Defendant E’s appeal, Defendant E did not submit a written reason for appeal within the submission period of the written reason for appeal, and Defendant E did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.