Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate (the plaintiff alleged that he lent 40 million won to the defendant over three times from May 8, 2009, but it is not sufficient to recognize the above facts only with Gap 1 (investment agreement), Gap 2-1 ( Original Copy of Notarial Deed), and Gap 8-2 (Written Complaint and Accusation) and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them. The above argument is without merit, since the court's reasoning for this case is identical to the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of first instance is legitimate, and thus the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.