The defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership on June 26, 2014 with respect to the housing of 75.7 square meters in Gunsan-si and cement bricks, slives, slives, and slves on its ground (hereinafter “instant building”).

The plaintiff is between the defendant and the defendant.

After the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant building, the Plaintiff completed remodeling construction for the instant building.

As such, the parents of the plaintiff and the defendant reside in the building of this case where the remodeling work was conducted.

[Reasons for Recognition] In full view of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3-1 and Eul evidence 3-2, the testimony and the purport of the entire argument of the witness D as to the claim of the entire pleadings, it is recognized that the defendant would pay the plaintiff the costs of materials and personnel expenses invested in the Corporation while entrusting remodeling construction to the plaintiff at the time of purchase of the building of this case.

According to the health expenses, appraiser E’s appraisal results, and the purport of the argument, with respect to the material expenses and personnel expenses incurred in remodeling the instant building, the Plaintiff’s construction expenses for electric wires and electric poles, etc. among the remodeling works performed for the instant building are recognized as having been spent in KRW 2,700,00 for the construction expenses for 1,593,00, X-cell, water pipes, water pipes, and boiler repair, and the fact that the construction expenses incurred in the remainder of the building except the aforementioned two parts are assessed as KRW 38,82,200 for the construction expenses incurred in the instant building

In light of the above facts, it is determined that the amount expected to be ordinarily invested in the remodeling project implemented in the building of this case is KRW 43,175,00. The plaintiff asserted that the amount actually invested is KRW 35,216,630 when filing the lawsuit of this case.

(See Evidence A No. 1). The defendant does not agree to pay the plaintiff the price normally required for the remodeling work of the building of this case, but agreed to pay the actual input price, and the result of the appraisal as seen earlier.