Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who intends to be a candidate for a Do political party in the 6th nationwide local election of Gangwon-do Council members, and is a person who has worked as a member of Gangwon-do 5th local election.

From 90 days before the election day to the election day, parliamentary activities shall not be reported by means other than posting on the Internet homepage or its bulletin board or video room, or transmitting e-mails or text messages.

Nevertheless, from March 20, 2014 to April 2014, the Defendant produced approximately 150 copies of the documents that report the contents of parliamentary activities, such as “business report made by a member of the Do Council in C”, “business report made by a member of the Do Council in C”, and “business report made by a member of the Do Council in C”, for each page, from March 20, 2014 to April 1, 2014, and distributed one copy of the above report and one copy of the newspapers to the electorate, who is the electorate-gun, the electorate-gun electorate-gun, a resident of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and one copy of the newspaper. In addition, the Defendant reported the parliamentary activities to the electorate by distributing the report in writing about 10 copies of the above report and one copy of the newspaper.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of G, J and K;

1. Each internal investigation report and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing each investigation report;

1. Article 256 (3) 1 (o) and Article 111 (1) of the Public Official Election Act (generality and choice of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not that of the defendant in that the defendant distributed his parliamentary report to the electorate in order to influence the election by taking advantage of his status as a member of the active duty service in Gangwon-do and the defendant's act impedes the fairness of election.

However, the defendant reflects his mistake, and the defendant has only been sentenced to a fine once.