The sentence of the court below seems to have taken into account all the above circumstances alleged by the defendant, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing since the decision of the court below was rendered, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor due to the violation of the Trademark Act, and thereby constitutes a repeated crime. In addition, the crime of coercion is limited to imprisonment with prison labor, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, environment, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit.