2. It is recognized that the decision-making defendant has committed his/her criminal act from the investigation stage to the trial of the party and reflects his/her criminal act.

However, the defendant saw the key to the object by using the gap in which the victim was locked, and caused the victim's right to object.

Although visibility equivalent to KRW 500,00,00 and the key of the victim’s vehicle was stolen and stolen as the key was behind the victim’s vehicle, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being sentenced to imprisonment for fraud at the Jeonju District Court on June 17, 2016 and was sentenced to one year from May 18, 2018 to one year on September 13, 2018 on the ground that the execution of the sentence was completed and the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes without being sentenced to imprisonment for fraud on September 13, 2018, despite the fact that the Defendant was a repeated offender after the execution of the sentence was completed, and the Defendant was punished on the charge of larceny at six occasions.

In addition, in full view of the defendant's age, sex, environment and other sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.